The mean energy loss of the heavy ions can be expressed as:
where
This formula is used to calculate the ionisation loss for all the charged hadrons.
In the case of ions, the charge of the ion makes the problem more difficult. Electron-exchange processes with the atoms change the charge as the ion traverses the medium. The main features of this process can be summarised as follows:
T/A | He ions | Pb ions |
MeV | error () | error () |
10 | 3 | 1 |
5 | 4 | 3 |
3 | 10 | 4 |
Table: Comparison of the measured and calculated
E for 10 MeV/A
ions in Pb
If we want to calculate the energy loss of the ion, we need a good parametrisation for the quantity . We give here a relatively simple parametrisation [,]:
| ||
|
where is the velocity and the atomic number of the ion (i.e. the charge of the bare nucleus).
1|c|T (MeV) | 6c|417 g | 6c|110
g
| ||||||||||
4c|MC (keV) | 2c|data (keV) | 4c|MC (keV) | 2c|data (keV) | |||||||||
E | dif | FWHM | dif | E | FWHM | E | dif | FWHM | dif | E | FWHM | |
4.88 | 785 | 8 | 59 | -23 | 725 | 77 | ||||||
9.85 | 3600 | 14 | 138 | -33 | 3150 | 206 | 816 | 8 | 67 | -26 | 756 | 91 |
19.79 | 3090 | 3 | 142 | -35 | 2990 | 218 | 719 | 3 | 70 | -32 | 699 | 103 |
29.27 | 2660 | 1 | 141 | -31 | 2630 | 204 | ||||||
29.75 | 620 | 4 | 69 | -26 | 598 | 93 | ||||||
39.70 | 2320 | 1 | 138 | -28 | 2300 | 191 | 550 | 4 | 68 | -24 | 528 | 90 |
Table: Comparison of the measured and calculated
E and FWHM
for O ions in Al; errors are in percent.
It can be seen that () neglects the (small) medium dependence of . For very high energies ( ) . For very low energies ( few keV) the formula breaks down. can even become negative for keV and . However this is not a serious source of error when calculating , since in this case the range of the ion is very small, and it can almost be said that it stops immediately.
The calculation of the energy loss straggling (fluctuations) differs from that of normal charged hadrons. For the charged hadrons the fluctuations come from the statistical nature of the projectile-atom interactions; for the ions there is another process which broadens the energy loss distribution: the fluctuation of the charge. For heavier ions this process dominates the energy loss straggling for MeV.
Figure: Stopping powers in Carbon
The heavy ions are in the Gaussian regime (see [PHYS332]) of the collisional fluctuations even in the case of very thin absorbers. If is not too high, the of the distribution:
where
9c|Pb ions in gas (energies in MeV) | |||||||||
3c| | 3c|Ar | 3c|Xe | |||||||
2cMonteCarlo | 1c|data | 2cMonteCarlo | 1c|data | 2cMonteCarlo | 1c|data | ||||
t (cm) | E | FWHM | FWHM | E | FWHM | FWHM | E | FWHM | FWHM |
0.2 | 25.9 | 1.15 | 1.1 | 25.4 | 1.30 | 1.4 | 51.1 | 2.26 | 2.5 |
0.4 | 53.6 | 1.62 | 1.5 | 52.4 | 1.84 | 1.9 | 107.0 | 3.22 | 3.3 |
0.8 | 112.0 | 2.25 | 2.0 | 111.0 | 2.59 | 2.6 | 236.0 | 4.51 | |
1.2 | 162.0 | 2.37 | 2.0 | 168.0 | 2.95 | 2.8 | |||
Table: Comparison of the measured and calculated and FWHM
for 1.4 MeV/A Pb ions in gas.
Analysing the experimental straggling data it is possible to find that the electron-exchange charge fluctuations can be described by a Gaussian with width:
where the parameter has been derived from the experimental straggling data.
If , which is the case for high energy heavy ions and for few MeV/A He ions, then .
Comparing equations () and () it can be seen that for heavy ions and for . The total energy loss fluctuation can be described by a Gaussian distribution with:
The mean energy loss and energy loss fluctuation calculation is performed in the routine GTHION, making use of the proton energy loss tables.
Note: The Gaussian fluctuation gives too broad a distribution for high energy in the case of thin absorbers. A correction has been introduced in GTHION which cures this discrepancy. In the absence of high energy straggling data for ions, the correction has been tuned using high energy energy loss data, where the has been tracked by GTHION.